Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 70,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 4:10 am
So if you – just like this Kat – have been wondering how each of the national trade mark offices is applying the CJEU’s guidance, there is a document compiled by European Trade Mark and Design Network (in short, the tmdn) that might be of profound help to you. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:34 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.February 7, 2023 - 1 PM: Eden Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods or services, without more. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:59 am
Most of the pertinent cases concern webpages. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
Opposer is thus not estopped from opposing Applicant’s registration of the mark shown in the Opposed Application because that mark is not the mark shown in the CTM Registration. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
In such cases, the Commissioner of Customs shall specify the additional wording to be used in conjunction with the name of the colony, possession, or protectorate.With regard to the Bailiwick of Jersey, Channel Islands, Customs has issued Treasury Decision (T.D.) 68-292(2), dated November 22, 1968, which states that, "[s]ince the States of Jersey, Channel Islands, attached to the Crown of England, are not a part of the United Kingdom or Great Britain, the marking "Made in… [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:01 am
Nor is it analogous to the mere insertion of "surprising, punctuation," or cases involving a "reversed order word" or a "mispelled" term. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:02 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:42 am
[Isn't "generic mark" a contradiction in terms? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 3:17 am
In view thereof, Opposer has not established a prima facie case of no bona fide intent to use. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Hard to tell in 4th Circuit’s description whether this is a TM case or a false advertising case. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
Mark's post below about the Parents Involved case and the argument over the meaning of Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Today marks the 805th anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta in a field at Runnymede. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:08 pm
In a recent law journal article authored about FDA approved labels and off-label uses, authors Mark Herrmann (of the [druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com]) and Pearson Bownas demonstrate the folly of letting the standard of care in medical malpractice cases be defined by whether the doctor used a prescription product "on label" or "off label. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 2:30 pm
The AP's Mark Sherman has this midterm review of the Supreme Court reporting on the Chief Justice's recent dissent in the Texas capital cases, Kennedy's voting record and the Court's interest in the death penalty. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:06 am
This past year has been marked by significant and, in some cases, opposing attitudes and practices with respect to multi-class share structures. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:42 am
The $16.5 million settlement marks the end of a case brought against HCA alleging violations of the False Claims Act and the Stark Statute. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:04 am
This - in a nutshell - were the issues on which the Nejvyšší soud České rep (Czech Supreme Court) had sought guidance from the CJEU in its reference for a preliminary ruling in Tommy Hilfiger Licensing and Others, C-494/15.This morning the CJEU delivered its judgment [without a prior Opinion of the Advocate General in this case (Melchior Wathelet)], holding that the operator of a physical marketplace may be forced to put an end… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In the case of Mark Becker the decision appears driven by two emotions, anger over whom he killed, rather than why he killed and whether he will ever be let out of prison. [read post]
