Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am
”[v] In making this point, Farmer cited the earlier case of DeShaney v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 11:48 am
In fact, one of the services that we provide for people that do estate planning with us is that we send out a series of note cards that help explain what each of the roles are. whether you’re a power of attorney agent, or you’re serving as a healthcare agent, or an executive or a trustee. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Of course, when you are one of the most powerful members of the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
The judiciary's ultimate role is to prevent the outcome of every dispute from turning on who has the most power. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
WASHINGTON, D.C. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
Eva-Maria Herring (who in the Qualcomm v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
" The New York Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Mensing (drug labeling) Joined amicus brief of blue states in American Electric Power Company Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:13 pm
Those who oppose broad federal powers can cite it as the example of federal powers run amuck. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” The Supreme Court added that “[t]his power, which, in its various ramifications, is known as the police power, is an exercise of the sovereign right of the government to protect the lives, health, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the people, and is paramount to any rights under contracts between individuals. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Remember Bush v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
It is an inauspicious exercise of legislative power that also sits uncomfortably with the Scottish Government’s decision to sponsor voting rights for people under 18, to whom – like prisoners – A3P1 doctrine does not grant a guaranteed franchise. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
” People v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:21 am
” Instead, it framed the issue as one of proximate cause, under the authority of Southern States Power Company v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
Allison Shelley for the ACLUIn the days following George Floyd’s murder, President Trump had focused his attention on the relatively small number of people who had damaged property, threatening to use the “unlimited power of our military” and tweeting “when the looting starts, the shooting starts. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm
– Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
