Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 178,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
This supports [defendant's] argument that [plaintiff] prolonged the litigation in bad faith after receiving the claims construction ruling. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
Judge Keys granted plaintiff’s motion to clarify the Court’s order that plaintiff produce documents related to two copyrighted, scientific articles that plaintiff alleges that defendants infringed by using them before the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:32 pm
Once again, on May 2, 2011, Defendants deny Plaintiff's request. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
” The Plaintiffs essentially claimed that eBay, Sotheby’s and Christie’s had failed to remit them royalties under the CRRA for as far back as 1976. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Originally posted 2005-12-15 18:37:23. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 4:13 am
Auburn argued that plaintiff's (collectively "DJ Plaintiffs") suit improperly anticipated Auburn's complaint which alleged Lanham Act claims of false designation and false advertising, as well as related state law claims. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:31 am
Defendant's motion to limit damages for plaintiff's claims of indirect infringement to "specific acts of infringement that [plaintiff] proves at trial” was denied as premature. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:18 pm
In this case, the Pennsylvania personal injury plaintiff settled her case against one defendant and the defendant's insurance company and signed a Release. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
Plaintiff filed for a restraining order alleging harassment.A little over one year after the parties broke up, defendant went to plaintiff’s home and, when no one answered the door, defendant left a note on plaintiff’s car. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:52 am
Officers entering plaintiff's house could rely on information from another officer that plaintiff was there to justify the entry on an arrest warrant. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 7:39 am
The court granted a third party customer's motion to quash defendants' deposition subpoenas regarding plaintiff's lost profits claim because the discovery was not relevant. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
As a result of the reports, Hartford terminated plaintiff’s long term disability benefits. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
As a result of the reports, Hartford terminated plaintiff’s long term disability benefits. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
In granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on defendants' false marking counterclaim, the court determined that plaintiff's warranty cards contained within its product packaging were not "used in advertising" as contemplated by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:30 am
In another post to this Blog, I lamented both the bias against any plaintiff and the especial bias against any plaintiff suing a doctor or hospital for medical negligence: Virginia’s not being on this list of “judicial hellholes” is no surprise to Virginia judges or the trial lawyers for the plaintiff and defense. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:30 am
In another post to this Blog, I lamented both the bias against any plaintiff and the especial bias against any plaintiff suing a doctor or hospital for medical negligence: Virginia’s not being on this list of “judicial hellholes” is no surprise to Virginia judges or the trial lawyers for the plaintiff and defense. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:02 am
.) -- reducing plaintiff’s requested fee award from $14,765 to $10,765 because time that plaintiff spent reviewing responsive records was not exclusively for purposes of litigation strategy, and because plaintiff’s “fee-on-fee” charges were unreasonably high. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:34 am
(Doemstic violence order of protection; cross-examination of plaintiff; "On appeal, the defendant argues, inter alia, that the court abused its discretion by precluding him from cross-examining the plaintiff during the hearing on the plaintiff's application for relief from abuse. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:22 am
In Ricky Moten v AETNA Life Insurance Company, a case filed recently at the District court for the Southern District of Texas, the plaintiff Ricky Moten through his Texas disability lawyer alleged that the AETNA Life Insurance Company (AETNA Life) being both the funder and administrator of the plaintiff's disability plan is working under an inherent Conflict of Interest and wrongfully denied the plaintiff's claim for disability benefits. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
[Plaintiff's] conduct is unacceptable. [read post]
