Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH" Results 8281 - 8300 of 14,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 9:18 am
  That section might also have been useful ammunition contrary to the result in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Orin Kerr
That was a huge deal in 1986 because Congress understandably assumed after Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
This approach is consistent with the law, with support for example from a 1969 decision Smith Kline.Sir Robin finally remarked that there is no evidence that patents prevent innovation. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:58 am by CMS
The taxpayers were wholly owned subsidiaries of a holding company, Smith & Williamson Holdings Ltd (“SWHL”). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
The idea appears to have been widely accepted — for example it was argued by counsel in Cardwell v Lucas (1836) 2 Meeson and Welsby 111 150 E.R. 691 and upheld by yhe Court of Exchequer in Gandy v Jubber (1865) 5 Best and Smith 15 122 E.R. 914. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:48 am
” Fortune also interviewed Microsoft GC Brad Smith and licensing chief Horacio Gutierrez, who discussed their plans to get free and open-source software (FOSS) users to pay royalties. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:02 am by Philip Thomas
  Ashley Ogden tried the case for plaintiff, assisted by Jim Smith and Wendy Yuan of Ogden and Associates, PLLC. [read post]