Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8281 - 8300
of 13,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
R. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:51 pm
Comm’r, 72 T.C. 1105 (U.S.T.C. 1979). [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:38 am
Schwizer v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
R. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:43 am
United States (Inter-Am. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:29 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
See also United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
Western States Petroleum Association v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:45 am
Horton, Inc. decision, (c) that AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:11 am
(c) Disposition Under the Law of War. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:38 am
About the Author: Douglas C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:24 am
Turina v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Judge Catherine C. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
