Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 2:26 pm
” The majority opinion in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
In another decision today, District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
The Supreme Court has stated "judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Bank of Edwardsville, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois found CAFA“is required reading for all who engage in class-action litigation. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
The district court and the panel readily rejected the notion that the city’s stated reason was just a pretext. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
First, it is worth noting that the case was argued on May 26 and decided on June 2. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
After stating the amounts or percentages allowable on sums distributed by the trustee that are less than one million dollars, §326 says that the court can award the trustee “reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all monies disbursed or turned over in the case to parties in interest, excluding the debtor [i.e., excluding Madoff]. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:02 pm
” “Approximately once every two months from 1989 to 1992, I, for Fendi, applied for provisional injunctive relief in district court to seize counterfeit goods from street vendors or retail stores. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
The court then ruled that the district didn't meet the requirements for review of a district court order and rescinded the writ. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
In Green v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
[pdf] View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
What is also unique about the book is that at times it is written like a treatise and at other times it includes the full text of court decisions like a law school case book. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:46 am
The closely divided (5-4) ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:18 pm
My admonition can be illustrated by a recent case from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, Bannister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Morrison v. [read post]
