Search for: "State v. South" Results 8281 - 8300 of 10,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
The groups include alumni of South Texas College of Law Houston and New England School of Law. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 8:20 pm
From the post:In the first, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Department of Energy reached a historic settlement with the state of South Carolina to remove 9.5 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium from a Cold War-era site in South Carolina by 2037 and to make an upfront payment to the state of $600 million. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)  … [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A trial has begun in South Dakota over a meat processer’s claim that it was defamed by ABC News reporting called its product “pink slime”. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am by Steve McConnell
So when your client is sued in West Virginia state court, one of the first things to consider is removal.That's what happened in Hartman v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
Article V of the Constitution requires Congress to call a convention to propose amendments if 34 state legislatures demand it. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:19 am by Gregory Forman
 Some of the impetus for this trend was the United States Supreme Court decision in Gomez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful –  Suneet Sharma. [read post]