Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8281 - 8300 of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
  Justice Harris followed Machado v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 11:32 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Second—and in what is, to my knowledge, a first—Judge McLaughlin’s memorandum confronts what has been (for some) a long-lingering Elephant in the Constitutional Room: the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am by Rachel Sandler
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
As Wagner C.J. stated at para. 160, “bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules”. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:18 am
If you need assistance, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Flood v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by David Bernstein
Merely pointing out that states don’t always follow one’s policy preferences is hardly a strong argument against federalism. (2) Professor Logan Sawyer of the University of Georgia Law School coincidentally has an excellent piece out on SSRN about the origins of Court’s holding in Hammer v. [read post]