Search for: "Supreme Court of Florida" Results 8281 - 8300 of 18,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 6:49 am by Jonathan Alper
There is a famous Florida Supreme Court case on piercing the corporate veil called the Dania Jai-Alai case.So what is "reverse piercing" of the corporate veil? [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:11 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance National: “Scam PAC Operator Uncovered by CNN’s KFile Pleads Guilty in Federal Court” by Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck (CNN) for MSN Florida: “Pompano Vice Mayor Beverly Perkins Accused of Misusing Leftover Campaign Funds in 2020 Election” by Lisa Huriash (South Florida Sun-Sentinel) for MSN Virginia: “Virginia Subcommittee on Campaign Finance Reform Still Failing to Complete Only Job” by Graham Moomaw for Virginia… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court has three times refused to hear inmates’ challenges on the issue — twice in 2004, in New York and Washington State cases, and once in 2005, in a Florida case. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
The United States Supreme Court is reviewing a Florida Supreme Court case where evidence of a drug dog's alert to illegal drugs was thrown out. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
The Florida Supreme Court picked the Lightbourne case to litigate the lethal injection issue. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:25 pm
This issue will more than likely be heard by the United States Supreme Court and they will be the ones to decide and interpret the bankruptcy code. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:26 pm
However, the Supreme Court ruled in this case that the Constitution does not allow someone to be sentenced to life-imprisonment without the possibility of parole when that person did not commit homicide. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm by Lanigan
The Florida Supreme Court is the court which independently decides which cases it hears or does not hear. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court has upheld some variations on the traditional requirement of a unanimous, twelve-person jury. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Adorno was suspended indefinitely Wednesday by the Florida Supreme Court for his role in a misleading $7 million class action settlement that benefited only seven people and got the firm a $2 million payday.As the firm was in the midst of restructuring, it absorbed an unexpected shock. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:16 am by Michael Rushford
  In 1998 the Florida Supreme Court overturned his death sentence because the prosecutor improperly introduced Bowles' hatred of homosexuals during the sentencing hearing. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to Montana Campaign Finance Law” by Holly Michels for Bozeman Daily Chronicle Pennsylvania: “Pa. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am by Regina M. Leidy
This week, the Supreme Court decided to effectively bar mandatory life terms for juveniles. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:21 am by Jonathan Bailey
The defendant then appealed that ruling, arguing it violated EU law, but lost at both an appeals court and now the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
When changing custody, the Florida Supreme Court held that the factor to consider is whether the parent is fit to care for the child and whether the change in custody would be detrimental to the best interest of the child. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:23 am
That same court denied the energy industry Petitioners a rehearing in December, so the Petitioners recently asked the US Supreme Court to review the regulations at issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:47 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court lacked the authority to hear the dispute now, because there was no final judgment by the state supreme court, which is considering currently whether the replacement map is valid. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Even the judge in Florida that struck down the entire law didn't buy the Medicaid argument. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The Florida Supreme Court reasoned (at 515-516): We believe that the common-law collateral source rule should be limited to those benefits earned in some way by the plaintiff. [read post]