Search for: "US v. John Doe" Results 8281 - 8300 of 11,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am by Jeff Gamso
The basic question — does the system accurately and consistently determine which defendants "deserve" to die? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:21 pm by One LLP Staff
Grimaldi, which instructs the court to consider a two-part test: (1) does the mark’s use have any artistic relevance to the underlying work, and (2) if so, does the use explicitly mislead the public as to the source of the work? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Khouli apparently appeared for arraignment on October 22, 2009 as “John Doe” at the request of the US Attorney’s Office, according to now publicly available court documents.The government charged Khouli in 2009 with smuggling cultural property into the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Of course, Crosskey’s originalism was of no use to these people. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm by Ross Dannenberg (Gamertag: Aviator)
GRAND VISION GAMING, LLC, TIMOTHY CARSON, and MERLE FRANK, and JOHN DOES 1-10. [read post]