Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 8281 - 8300
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 10:57 am
The Ninth Circuit handed down an interesting little habeas ruling today in Kessee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:15 am
Holley Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
") Pierce v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
Apparently, In re IPO Securities Litigation overruled two Second Circuit cases on class certification: Caridad v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
• The amounts allowable to Picard at a top level of three percent of the amount he distributes, would be obscene. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 6:58 am
Publication at grant is the first level of publication. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:07 pm
(The link is in yesterday's post.)David Ranck has sent us a link to his new (?) [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:12 am
Vega v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Granted, the case is currently in a lower federal court, bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Granted, the case is currently in a lower federal court, bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
The "invisible hand" continues to give us the finger. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
” If further review is granted, the gun rights groups asked for additional briefing. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
Thus, the Court of Appeals concluded that the course of conduct engaged in by Amway demonstrated a legitimate business justification, and thus could not be used to infer a horizontal allocation of customers or territories, or the fixing of price levels. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially… [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 11:08 am
The Nasrallah decision was at the trial level and, essentially, merely involved granting additional time. [read post]
