Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 8281 - 8300 of 9,462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
D2008-0647 andGrupo Costamex, SA de C.V. v Stephen Smith and Oneandone Private Registration / 1&1 Internet Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Smith, of Kirkland & Ellis, on a subject dear to our hearts: "Preemption after Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
  Contemporary debates about originalism sometimes use the label, "the New Originalism" to distinguish the current emphasis on "original public meaning" from older forms of originalism that emphasized "original intentions. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami also outlined organizational changes under consideration with a focus on making the Enforcement Division more “strategic, swift, smart and successful,” including: • creating specialized groups of attorneys along product, market or transactional lines and increasing collaboration among staff across regions; • flattening the management structure of the Division and reducing the… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:28 pm
Smith says that use of an audio tape recorder will alter the nature of a psychiatric exam, and may make the examinee reluctant to answer some questions. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: A jury convicted Morris of felony property destruction. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:24 am
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm by Steven Hansen
As it turns out this Connors case below was not heard by the California or US Supreme Court.Essentially the court opinion below upheld the 1959 California Superme Court decision Cosper v. [read post]