Search for: "CO.1. Means"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 16,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
But what does this mean? [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
§§ 76-7-101(1), (2) (West 2014). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
Uniquely Federal Interests: 1. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Rantanen also noted that the Federal Circuit has failed to grapple with the meaning of Nautilus and has continued to rely on its pre-Nautilus cases when evaluating definiteness. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Co., supra. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:07 pm
The Board said that, applying “long-established principles,” it held that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both “employers” within the meaning of the common law; and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:30 pm
Co. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
For example, on 5-1-15 the insurer starts the premium calculations for the policy year of 7-1-15 through 6-30-16. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:01 am
A-Best Products Co. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
What does the Fourteenth Amendment mean when it refers to people who are born here but not subject to U.S. jurisdiction? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 11:22 am
To learn more, contact us at 1-800-773-8622 today to schedule a free and confidential consultation. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:24 am
Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
Co. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
In England, Canada and, to large degree, Australia, defendants may, under the Polly Peck ([1986] QB 1000), Lucas-Box ([1986] 1 WLR 147) and Control Risks ([1990] 1 WLR 183) lines of authorities, plead that the allegedly defamatory words bear alternative meanings to those pleaded by the plaintiff, and seek to defend the claim in respect of those alternative – and invariably less stinging – meanings. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:04 pm
Four quick thoughts on the Ashley Madison hack: 1. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Bethea, 1 Misc. 3d 909(A), 2004 WL 190054, *1–*2 (N.Y. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:02 am
Dukes for certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) class, Tyson argues. e Thus, the company argues, the variations described above mean the litigation would not provide common answers to the questions of (1) whether an employee worked more than 40 hours per week and, (2) if so, whether Tyson properly paid the employee for that overtime. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 10:01 pm
There was a lot of hand-washing going on during the Northwest Washington Fair last week in Lynden, WA. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
He quoted extensively from the Missouri case of Eyerman et al v Mercantile Trust Co. [read post]
