Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 33,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 11:54 am
The ongoing dispute between the Writers’ Guild of America (“WGA”) and the Association of Talent Agencies (“ATA”) took a new turn recently when the WGA announced that it would use the authority granted to it under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) to “preempt” California state law and effectively “deputize” attorneys and managers to perform acts that only licensed talent agencies can provide under… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
When another federal district court in California issued a March 6 injunction in California v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Regents of Univ. of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) (property interest in one’s genetic material)15. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:54 pm
But in that Qualcomm v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Boyle v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Boyle v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Baker Jr. is Professor Emeritus of Law at the Louisiana State University Law Center. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:09 am
Bemis Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Securi [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
On March 22nd, Professor Baker was the featured speaker at the Northern California Association of Law Libraries’ Spring Institute in San Francisco, California. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
California Classification Laws: In addition to staying on the right side of the FTC, companies should also be careful to stay on the right side of the recent California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:41 pm
And the California Supreme Court thinks that the new law is a fairly material new matter, so it orders the Court of Appeal to take a new look at the issue under the new statute.Which the Court of Appeal promptly does. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
And although the California court in this case accepted this “enumeration clause” claim, the New York court appropriately threw it out. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
It does not touch upon joint employment under other federal laws or any state laws. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:27 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
” Unintentionally Transmitted Writings Hanna Shafran, an associate of Zaller Law Group, discussed new California Rule 4.4, which codified the 2007 ruling in Rico v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
” Unintentionally Transmitted Writings Hanna Shafran, an associate of Zaller Law Group, discussed new California Rule 4.4, which codified the 2007 ruling in Rico v. [read post]
