Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
*Citing McManus v Board of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free School District, 87 NY2d 183, the Appellate Division affirmed a Supreme Court's ruling that annulled New York City Department of Education's [DOE] discontinuing Petitioner's employment and directed the educator's reinstatement to her former position as a tenured teacher with back salary. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
So the next time I see a granted legal sufficiency issue in the Daily Journal, I'll suppress my natural inclination to wonder why CAAF is wasting its time on such a dog, now that I know that the dog does occasionally hunt. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
Sibron v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:40 am
Facebook, and Doe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
” (Quoting: Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Presiding Justice Ramirez’s opinion does not explain why he is declining to follow Jones; the opinion does not even acknowledge that he is doing so. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 8:56 am
Alfaro Manzano v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
Welch, 4 F.3d 761, 764 (9th Cir. 1993) (consent does not reach to passenger's purse), United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:23 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:44 am
Janus v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:44 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:31 pm
Koch Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:38 pm
The policy does not deprive the employee of his right to representation by his union. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 12:11 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Burnett v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:12 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
The Court also held that the Federal Arbitration Act does not preempt California unconscionability law. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:52 am
See Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:03 am
Prior to sentencing, the Supreme Court handed down District of Columbia v. [read post]