Search for: "John Doe 2" Results 8301 - 8320 of 13,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 3:12 am by John L. Welch
"Applicant pointed out that the USPTO does not provide a design code for the question mark for purposes of searching the USPTO database, arguing that the PTO thus "does not believe that the question mark is a significant feature of the mark, and that it is not necessary to include the question mark in a search for the mark. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
(2) Does the judicial misconduct reflected in the trial record serve as a basis for granting former MSG John Hatley a new trial? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
What does this tell us about the scope of the case? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
Third, it argues that the subpoena was an overly broad “John Doe” subpoena. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Monster has not responded to the lawsuit. 2: Judge Sides with Porn P2P Plaintiff, Setting up Legal Showdown Next up today, Timothy Lee of Ars Technica reports that a judge in Washington DC has sided with AF Holdings, a shell company suing some 1,058 “John Doe” plaintiffs who allegedly shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand”, ordering ISPs to turn over information about the suspected infringers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
And so the Board was unable to assess the impact of Applicant's long use on the purchasing public.In sum, Applicant failed to carry its heavy burden under Section 2(f).TTABlog comment: Compare the Board's analysis here with that in recent Hershey case [TTABlogged here], where the Board was careful in recognizing that although a design may be de facto functional, the details or refinements may not be de jure functional: i.e, the scoring on the Hershey bar has a utilitarian purpose,… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
You’ve seen it applied in everything from a John Wayne western to Star Wars. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:46 am by Lara
Geils is the nickname and stage name of John Warren Geils who founded the J. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:34 am by royblack
The latest was in John Goodman’s trial. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am by John L. Welch
In re Ameritox Ltd., 101 USPQ2d 1081 (TTAB 2011) [precedential].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm by Anthony Lake
Chief Justice John Marshall, who authored the opinion in Gibbons, observed that there were limits on Congress’ power to regulate under the Commerce Clause: “It is not intended to say that these words comprehend that commerce, which is completely internal, which is carried on between man and man in a State, or between different parts of the same State, and which does not extend to or affect other States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm by Anthony Lake
Chief Justice John Marshall, who authored the opinion in Gibbons, observed that there were limits on Congress’ power to regulate under the Commerce Clause: “It is not intended to say that these words comprehend that commerce, which is completely internal, which is carried on between man and man in a State, or between different parts of the same State, and which does not extend to or affect other States. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The panel was moderated by Paul Wilson (who does not have a link, since he will soon be taking the bench as a Superior Court Judge in Massachusetts). [read post]