Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 21,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 11:52 am
Under Maryland law, in cases such as this one, the plaintiff must prove the following elements in order to establish a manufacturer's liability: (1) the product was defective when it left the manufacturer or seller’s control; (2) the product was unreasonably dangerous; (3) the product’s defect caused the plaintiff’s injuries; and (4) there was no substantial change in the product’s condition prior to its reaching the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:15 am
A defendant (business) may not be liable where plaintiff (the injured person) acts in a manner that disregards ordinary caution or reasonable care in the face of a known or obvious dangerous condition. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
A store owner is not liable for every accident that occurs on the premises. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:09 am
The jury in the casefound the defendants 75 percent liable for the accident and decedent 25 percent comparatively liable. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Tex. 2004) ("If one plaintiff prevailed but another plaintiff lost, the defendant could act in a consistent manner" by paying the winning plaintiff and not paying the losing one.); Moore's Fed. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
As a result, any FCRA liability for that data seems inconsistent with Section 230’s rule that electronic databases aren’t liable for third-party content. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:33 pm
After further investigation, you find that — though the defendant was negligent in the operation of their vehicle — the defendant’s vehicle malfunctioned at the time of the accident, and that this malfunction was caused by the negligence of the defendant’s auto mechanic. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
The appellate court also rejected Progressive's argument that the "Other Insurance" clause of the Harco policy rendered Harco liable for coverage in this case: Contrary to the contention of Progressive, that clause does not in fact render Harco liable to provide insurance coverage with respect to all vehicles owned by Burdick. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:13 am
" At trial, the defendants claimed that they didn’t owe the boy any duty of care (and thus could not be held liable for the accident) because the boy was trespassing when he entered the closed pool. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
All four defendants were former inmates. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:35 am
Product Liability; and Who Can Be Held Liable for Construction Worker Accidents? [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
According to the appellate court, the lower court was incorrect when it held that the defendant was not liable because the drain was open and obvious. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:58 am
The district court, unsurprisingly, agreed despite the existence of the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act, which indicates that state entities are liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am
In opposition to P AMs motion the defendants/third-party plaintiffs contend that plaintiff and PAM are agents of one another and thus PAM is vicariously liable for the plaintiffs alleged fraudulent conduct. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Origlieri, 2021 ONSC 7650 [74] In accordance with s.267.5(5) of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.I.8, a Defendant may only be liable for the non-pecuniary losses of the Plaintiff, if the Plaintiff can prove that he or she sustained either (a) a permanent serious disfigurement or (b) a permanent serious impairment of an important physical, mental or psychological function. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm
Liable parties could include a negligent or careless driver, a manufacturer of a defective auto part, or an insurance company that represents a liable defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm
It argued that the City’s counterclaims sought to hold Turo liable for content published by users on Turo’s platform. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm
It argued that the City’s counterclaims sought to hold Turo liable for content published by users on Turo’s platform. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:23 pm
If you’ve ever forwarded an email, Section 230 protected you: if a court found that email defamatory, Section 230 would guarantee that you can’t be held liable for it; only the author can. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:44 pm
The Reshkos were held liable to the Diamonds for $406,698.00, plus fees and costs. [read post]
