Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 21,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2017, 6:01 am
In other words, if the plaintiff was 15 percent negligent in causing the bike crash and the defendant was 85 percent liable, the plaintiff would still recover, but his or her damages would be reduced by 15 percent. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:25 pm
’s blood work showed no intoxicants. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:51 am
Defendants offer nothing to justify their actions. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:13 am
Therefore, they are legally liable for plaintiff’s injuries, both physical and mental, unless and until the jury makes a finding in favor in plaintiff. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:38 am
However, the family of the driver of the car, who were the original defendants, felt that it was mainly the car manufacturer’s fault that the injuries occurred. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
In a case that has the management-side bar moaning and groaning, the 9th Circuit held that an attorney who set up an ICE deportation sting against a client's former employee could be held personally liable for retaliation. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:57 pm
The defendant party could choose to claim the plaintiff was independently liable for her or his negligence. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
In a brief filed June 30 in the Fifth Circuit, the current arena for the legal challenge to the DOL’s revised overtime rule, the agency made it clear that it will vigorously defend its right to establish a salary level for purposes of defining who qualifies as exempt from overtime under the FLSA’s “white collar” exemptions. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm
[i] The prohibition on indemnifying corporate D’s and O’s against derivative claims avoids the circularity of a company having to indemnify the defendants against the company’s own claims. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:35 am
In contrast, the defendant provided an assessment from the World Health Organization, stating that MDI can irritate lung tissues and cause asthma-like symptoms, but it is not associated with other bad outcomes. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:11 am
On appeal, the court reversed the trial court’s decision and found that the truck’s owner should only be liable for the $100,000 statutory maximum. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Some of these states and cities even indicate that parents can be liable even if they don’t know underage drinking was taking place in their home. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:56 am
Thus, as a result of the court’s opinion, the defendant will be held individually liable for the plaintiff’s loss, but the trust will not be liable. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:26 am
The Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe) dismissed the defendant’s appeal and the cross-appeal, holding – in line with the earlier Supreme Court decisions – that the defendant could only be liable for its customer’s acts in Germany if the defendant had positive knowledge of these customers delivering the products in Germany. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Can property owners be liable for the criminal acts of third parties? [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Can property owners be liable for the criminal acts of third parties? [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 12:07 pm
The plaintiff moved for summary judgment at trial, arguing that there were no factual issues that needed to be decided by a jury and that the court should determine that the defendant was liable as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:58 am
Thus, the defendants were collectively liable for $750,000. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:23 am
This is only applicable in cases in which the defendant’s conduct was outrageous or malicious, and it is often sought in drunk driving accident death cases. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:55 am
At some point, she attempted to pass the defendant. [read post]
