Search for: "Office of Information and Privacy" Results 8301 - 8320 of 16,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 9:32 am by Davis Wright Tremaine
Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), “informed consent” can, among other ways, take the form of browser settings—even a default setting to accept cookies that has not been changed by the user (assuming adequate and prominent disclosures have been provided). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:04 pm by John Richards
On the other hand, they have held that a police officer walking by a house, and happening to see illegal activity through a window or open door, does not constitute a search, and that information obtained via such means can be used in court whether or not there was a search warrant. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Using automated bots, hiQ scraped information from public profiles of users on LinkedIn and used this information to provide “business analytics” services to clients. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am by INFORRM
  The majority assumed, without ruling, that there is a constitutional right to “informational privacy” holding that it was not violated. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:14 am
Other petty officers also stayed at FC2 SW's apartment. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:46 am
  But of course that is the point of developing a regulatory system over an information ecology rather than one that  regulates the relationship between an individual and information. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:05 am by Justin P. Webb
Because computers can hold so much information touching on many different areas of a person's life, there is a greater potential for the "intermingling" of documents and a consequent invasion of privacy when police execute a search for evidence on a computer. . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
[is a] significant encroachment upon that citizen's privacy interests, with limited exception, warrantless searches of the interior of an automobile are proscribed. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:25 am by 1 Crown Office Row
After cross-party condemnation and criticism from the Information Commissioner’s Office and others, that Bill was withdrawn, with Home Office officials sent back to the drawing board. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:06 pm by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Previously, DFARS 252.204-7012 required contractors to implement specified security controls from NIST SP 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
(see Privacy and Information Security Law Blog.) [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Third, the system put in place to implement the fee would provide little or no information that isn’t otherwise collected by road cameras, traffic light cameras, existing electronic tolling systems, credit card records, the eyes and ears of traffic enforcement officers, and similar technologies and practices currently in place.Another objection is that people won’t accept a mileage-based road fee or the systems adopted to implement it. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
  The court then took up James’ claim concerning the applicability of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
As a practical matter, however, use of the cloud means that a lawyer’s (or law firm’s) email, word processing, and document management systems – and all of the confidential client information contained on them – are no longer housed within the four walls of the lawyer’s office, but rather, somewhere in cyberspace that the lawyer may not be able to readily identify at any given point in time. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
The Court has in the past held that, as soon as you share information with any third party, you’ve given up any “expectation” of privacy. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Don’t hide behind an anonymous Chief Information Officer, a faceless public relations agency, or even worse, a PR intern. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber dismissed the Information Commissioner’s Office appeal of a lower court’s decision to overturn an order requiring Experian to change how it handles customer data. [read post]