Search for: "S. W., an individual"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 11,718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
In a press release accompanying the appointments, President Obama stated, “We can’t wait to act to strengthen the economy and restore security for our middle class and those trying to get in it, and that’s why I am proud to appoint these fine individuals to get to work for the American people. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
By William W. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:50 am
Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law A: 1255 W. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 am
When George W. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
When George W. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:48 pm
” ALJ Rogers agreed with Openwave that RIM’s affirmative defense of inequitable conduct failed to name the specific individual involved in the alleged inequitable conduct, failed to allege facts showing that anyone knew of the alleged inequitable conduct, and failed to identify which claims the allegedly withheld references were relevant to, and thus held this defense to be inadequately pled. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm
Looking up the parcel number it gives the legal description of ” BARTON RO COM ON S LI NE 1/4 LOT 20 N 89 DEG 21 MIN W 74.43 FT FROM SE COR TH N 89 DEG 21 MIN W 77 FT TH N 27.76 FT TO S LI A T AND S F R/W TH S 70 DEG 44 MIN E 81.56 FT ALG SD R/W LI TO POB EX STATE HGWY .25 AC. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:16 am
Kite Bros., No. 11-334 c/w 11-335 (La. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am
Individuals who knew about BPA’s existence and the surrounding controversy before purchasing defendants’ products had no injury. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
Elder and originally edited by David W. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Moreover, the fact that the person waived any rights as an employee, signed a statement asserting he/she is an independent contractor or is issued a 1099 instead of a W-2 does not give the employer any cover. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
The appellate court found that “[w]hile it is indeed the case that the examination at issue of [Deprospero’s] property occurred after sentencing on another charge and followed [his[ request for the return of such property,” the search did not violate Deprospero’s 4th Amendment rights “for a number of reasons. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court described it, “the Star Chamber has, for centuries, symbolized disregard of basic individual rights. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
Accordingly, the contours of the ‘substantial support’ and ‘associated forces’ bases of detention will need to be further developed in their application to concrete facts in individual cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
In the majority opinion, Judges Brown, joined by Judge Kavanaugh, argued not only that the laws of war should not inform interpretation of the AUMF’s limits, but even that the AUMF should not be construed to avoid authorizing violations of that body of international law: “[W]hile the international laws of war are helpful to courts when identifying the general set of war powers to [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm
Just because we find a prohibited item on an individual does not mean they had bad intentions, that's for the law enforcement officer to decide. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
This is the fourth in a multi-part post summarizing last week’s 5th Annual Conference on the Globalization of Class Actions and Mass Litigation. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:03 pm
Ruiz explained, `[W]ithout having the password that belongs to the creator of that website, you can only view what's there[.] [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:01 am
This is a 60% increase from what was seen in George W. [read post]
