Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8301 - 8320
of 13,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm
The case is Endrew F by Joseph F & Jennifer F v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Considering criminal conviction in determining qualification of an applicant for employment in the public serviceMatter of El v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50883(U), Decided on April 1, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Alice Schlesinger [This opinion will not be published in the Official Reports.]Civil Service Law Section 50.4 provides for the disqualification of applicants or eligibles for appointment in the Classified Service and states that:… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:26 am
" Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
If an employee has been served with disciplinary charges, his or her right to a disciplinary hearing survives his or her retirement from the position Matter of Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), September 12, 2008, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Thomas Charles Berg, Religious Organizational Freedom and Conditions on Government Benefits, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2009).Perry Dane, West Virginia State Board of Education V. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:08 pm
Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:54 pm
P. 1.140(c) (stating such motions may be brought only after the pleadings are closed). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
For example, in a New York state case from 1995, Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:12 am
But in R. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
C. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
Minassian v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
There is therefore a “disagreement which affects the result” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
Piacentini, C. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Tax: Treaties; GAARCanada v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
That FTUG has infringed or will infringe, after the FTUG ANDA is approved, one or more claims of the '325 patent;C. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
Div. v. [read post]
