Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8301 - 8320
of 15,318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
’ Therefore, the panel and board found that Mismas's alcohol dependency qualified as a mitigating factor pursuant to [Rules and Regulations] 10(B)(2)(g).Lake County Bar Association v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
The Department of Belatedly Blogged Interesting Niceties (DOBBIN) has finally got round to writing up Data Marketing and & Secretarial Ltd and Winning Deals Ltd v S & S Enterprises Ltd and Selective Marketplace Ltd [2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC), a ruling of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Judge Hacon) for England and Wales way back on 16 May 2014, when this Kat's head was still full of the INTA Meeting in Hong Kong. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:37 am
Zalewski v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
In Steiner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
Id. at *14-16.b. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
To support a malicious prosecution claim, “[t]here must be (a) a criminal proceeding instituted or continued by the defendant against the plaintiff, (b) termination of the proceeding in favor of the accused, (c) absence of probable cause for the proceeding, and (d) malice, or a primary purpose in instituting the proceeding other than that of bringing an offender to justice. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:21 am
Separate concurring opinions were filed by Justices Baxter and Chin (Ayala v Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc, June 30, 2014, Werdegar, K). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
§ 17.3(c). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
§ 17.3(c). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:25 pm
§ 1983, and for violation of Article V, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:35 pm
C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:01 pm
So holds the Washington Court of Appeals in today’s City of Seattle v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
Mark Rienzi, who won last week’s McCullen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Privacy advocates are hailing the Supreme Court’s decision last Wednesday in Riley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Privacy advocates are hailing the Supreme Court’s decision last Wednesday in Riley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Thus, state Plaintiffs, Panacea's actions will actively induce and/or contribute to infringement of the '703 and '325 patents. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
See, e.g., In re Cutter, 398 B.R. 6, 21 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Nelson v. [read post]
