Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 29,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
” But, years after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
An ambiguity in a provision in a collective bargaining agreement may sometimes be resolved by waiving the parol evidence ruleBaff v Board of Educ. of The Fonda-Fultonville Cent. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
An ambiguity in a provision in a collective bargaining agreement may sometimes be resolved by waiving the parol evidence ruleBaff v Board of Educ. of The Fonda-Fultonville Cent. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm
This type of authoritarian overreaching to attack and dismantle the rule of law follows the pattern of authoritarian trends globally, as evidenced by V-Dem Institute’s 2018 Annual Democracy Report. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 10:21 am
In fact, in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP v Fishman 2019 NY Slip Op 30413(U) February 15, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 655198/2017 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is the story of bad planning and missed opportunities. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in American Legion/Maryland National-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
To submit within 120 days a report on their plans to maximize the use of products produced within the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:40 pm
See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Facts: This case (Sherwood v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:59 am
The Constitution demands better [Ilya Shapiro on Cato Institute cert amicus brief in Copeland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in Atkins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
” The concurring opinion differs from the lead opinion on this point, stating: “Because the CEQA claim was timely filed and served this case does not require us to decide whether CEQA or the planning and zoning law is narrower and controls. [read post]
