Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 11,118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
Today, the ICA issued an unpublished memorandum opinion in State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:31 pm
As discussed in this article by Kate Moser in The Recorder, the case, People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
The case of Bullcoming v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
The court did not offer a rationale other than stating it would be considered "additional alimony to the wife. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
” Special Agent in Charge John V. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
In announcing the selection, Sotomayor stated: "For over twenty-seven years, Chief Judge Ricardo H. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
In announcing the selection, Sotomayor stated: "For over twenty-seven years, Chief Judge Ricardo H. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:14 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:50 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
As to seven states the status is unclear. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
For large companies in general, the ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
But even seven years after this AI form was produced by ISO, not every insurer uses it. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Miriam Baer comments on Thursday’s seven-two decision in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
And who shouldered the cost for this seven month pointless adventure in forum shopping? [read post]
