Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 8301 - 8320 of 12,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The decision cites only two New York cases in support of its holding: the McGraw-Hill case which, as noted above, involved the underlying activities of a subsidiary but did not involve a request to inspect the subsidiary’s records, and a cryptic 1960 Second Department ruling (Bluhdorn v Greenwald Industries, Inc., 12 AD2d 662) affirming without opinion an unpublished lower court ruling directing an inspection. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
 Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:08 am by Joy Waltemath
One employee described a work-sponsored retreat where “[a]t the end of the meeting we all had to hold hands in a circle. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the court briefly discussed, but didn't resolve, the question whether § 922(g)(4) may be unconstitutional: In D.C. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Mylan Labs., Inc., and Dystar Textilfarben GmbH v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:22 am by Josh H. Escovedo
  15 U.S.C. section 1127; Rust Env’t & Infrastructure, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:18 am by Elizabeth McCuskey
They can be “subsumed within an already tightly circumscribed legal analysis,” as the court recently explained in the patent-construction context in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
" Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. [read post]