Search for: "THU L" Results 8301 - 8320 of 12,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 1:13 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Thus, the case here is once again distinguishable from Amnesty Int’l. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:59 am by John L. Welch
Thus even without a "strict overlap" of the involved goods, and without resorting to the natural area of expansion doctrine, the Board found a close relationship between the parties' respective goods.Finally, the Board found IPOD to be a conceptually strong mark, a coined and fanciful term as applied to Apple's goods. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Thus, there was also predominance for the NY claims. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:08 pm by Arthur J. Fried
L. 104-193, codified in various sections of Titles 8 and 42 of the United States Code.)Generally speaking, aliens who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence, asylees, refugees, paroled into the United States for at least one year, having their deportation withheld, granted conditional entry, Cuban or Haitian entrants, or victims of battering or extreme cruelty by a family member are “qualified aliens” (see 8 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Lawyers are advocates, and thus, more often than not, use history more as a tool for arguing a particular interpretation of a legal doctrine rather than studying it as a field in and of itself. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
 09-0197-cv(L), 09-4509-cv(XAP), 2ndCir: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a case of first impression, AFFIRMED the district court's grant of summary judgment of an HR director's Title VII retaliation claim because the internal sexual harassment investigation she conducted was unconnected to an EEOC charge or proceeding and, thus, was not protected activity under Title VII's participation clause. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
 09-0197-cv(L), 09-4509-cv(XAP), 2ndCir: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a case of first impression, AFFIRMED the district court's grant of summary judgment of an HR director's Title VII retaliation claim because the internal sexual harassment investigation she conducted was unconnected to an EEOC charge or proceeding and, thus, was not protected activity under Title VII's participation clause. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:00 am by Jason Schultz
Christopher Jon Sprigman, Christopher Buccafusco, & Zachary Burns, Valuing Attribution and Publication in Intellectual Property (Va L. [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:57 pm
When we last checked in on the fate of the new US law applying countervailing duties to imports from "non-market economies" like China and Vietnam, the plaintiffs in the court case that started the whole legislative scramble (GPX Int'l Tire Corp v. [read post]