Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 8301 - 8320 of 55,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In a 2008 interview with CBS News, Scalia declared, “[T]here are anti-abortion people who think that the Constitution requires a state to prohibit abortion. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm by Giles Peaker
A possession claim (Axnoller v Brake) and an eviction claim (Brake v Axnoller). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm by NCC Staff
In this spirit, Professor Codrington argues, the American people should now pass a constitutional amendment affirmatively guaranteeing the right to vote in order to overturn the Court’s decisions in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:08 am by Jane Turner
McWilliam was an outsider within a hypermasculine profession, law enforcement. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:45 am by Marina Wilson
With the resources available through the NIL section of the Sports Law Center, stakeholders and other interested people can better understand how the rules have evolved (and continue to evolve), as well as what may be permitted v. what may be prohibited by the current landscape of laws and NCAA regulations. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Draft Chapter, in: Silja Vöneky, Philipp Kellmeyer, Oliver Müller and Wolfram Burgard (ed.) [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am by Jason Rantanen
Avoiding recognition and enforcement abroad is not always possible; the August 2021 decision in Next Investments, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 6:38 am by Michael Caruso
 Second, although Judge Martin grounded her opinions on the facts and law of the case, I believe she never forgot that these cases are about people and not abstract legal questions. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]