Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 8321 - 8340 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the biofuel cause of action, defendant met his initial burden on the cross motion by establishing that plaintiff’s allegations of damages are entirely speculative (see Lincoln Trust v Spaziano, 118 AD3d 1399, 1401 [4th Dept 2014]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2d Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 857 [2013]), and thus plaintiff is “unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of [his] legal malpractice… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, defendants met their initial burden on the motion with respect to that element (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 Big majorities of the Court have been wrong before (obvious examples: Plessy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Kutler’s entry on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
Court of Appeals has denied a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc in Casitas Municipal Water District v. [read post]