Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 8321 - 8340 of 11,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 3:39 pm
App. 2d Dist. 1997) and Comm. to Save the Beverly Highlands Homes Ass'n v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:02 am by admin
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  However, as we predicted, to date, there has been no public record identifying an individual as a cooperator or the credit that individual received in return for their cooperation. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:04 pm by Michael O'Hear
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin may have added to the procedural complexity and uncertainty of Wisconsin postconviction law with its decision last week in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Davies and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 6 – 7 July 2011. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Rewards can be increased in size based on (1) the significance of the information provided, (2) the whistleblower's cooperation, (3) the extent of the SEC's "law interest" in the case, and (4) the whistleblower's cooperation with internal compliance. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
  If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:20 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
The City of Los Angeles (“Los Angeles”) went on record yet again, rebuffing a cooperative effort between the City of Ontario (“Ontario”) and County of San Bernardino (“San Bernardino”) to promote growth at Ontario International Airport (“ONT”). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]