Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 17,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
And in Smith, the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone numbers he dialed from his home phone because, as a necessary step in placing phone calls, he shared that information with the phone company. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 9:01 am
Many companies and advocacy organizations state that they support law enforcement action and believe crimes should be fully investigated; their objection is only to making imprudent security sacrifices to that end. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 7:12 am
The Court ruled that the fact that the investors may have held securities in the Netherlands is insufficient for jurisdiction of the Dutch courts in the absence of other connecting factors. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:45 am
Companies defending against data breach litigation may wish to keep this distinction in mind, as a plaintiff winning the standing battle does not mean that the plaintiff will win the war of a Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:16 pm
Based on the requirements of Texas product liability claims, the plaintiff will need to demonstrate that the defendant breached their duty to keep the plaintiff safe. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:16 am
Malicious cyber activity that undermines national economic security through cyber-enabled economic espionage or sabotage. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:49 am
On September 27, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint against oil services company Weatherford International PLC (“Weatherford”), consequently garnering a $140 million settlement related to fraudulent income tax accounting (the “Complaint”). [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:22 am
In Vivendi, the Second Circuit (i) clarified the requirements for proving “loss causation” in securities fraud cases and (ii) endorsed the “inflation-maintenance” theory of liability, under which defendants may be liable for false statements that maintain (but do not increase) the price of a company’s stock. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:10 am
The most important distinction between the two kinds of policies is that the public company form is built around the possibility that the defendant company might incur liabilities under the securities laws, and the private company policy generally assumes that the insured company does not have liabilities under the federal securities laws. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
The Defendants specifically violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”), Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
The Complaint charges the Defendants with violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“The Exchange Act”). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:18 am
This is because these insurance companies go to work immediately to try and defend themselves against a potential claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:18 am
This is because these insurance companies go to work immediately to try and defend themselves against a potential claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 7:44 am
If the defendant pleads guilty to drunk driving in connection with an accident, it will be much more difficult for his or her insurance company to later deny any claims of liability. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:41 am
Sept. 30, 2016)Two black-car companies sued Uber for false advertising, false association, and tortious interference with contractual relations between them and their drivers. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:50 am
Also, the plaintiff is no longer required to prove the defendant’s negligence. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Join us to defend our rights and those of the future. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In agreeing with the Defendant Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
It is a dark time for China’s reformers, dissidents, and rights defenders as they face escalating repression and conditions deteriorated again last year,” said Representative Smith. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
EFF Argues that NSL Secrecy Violates First Amendment and Chills Debate on Government SurveillanceSan Francisco - An appeals court published redacted briefing by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today arguing that national security letters (NSLs) and their accompanying gag orders violate the free speech rights of companies who want to keep their users informed about government surveillance. [read post]
