Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 8321 - 8340 of 18,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This Friday’s Five is the first of two posts on employer’s obligations to conduct prompt and effective investigations into harassment complaints. 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:58 pm by Becky Koblitz
However, unlike the AML, this provision of the revised AUCL does not include the possibility of mitigation of penalties. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:00 pm by Frances Hansen (US)
” Simply stated, CMS does not seem willing to continue to negotiate without an expansion of Medicaid in Texas. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:26 am by emagraken
In the context of proportionality such an option does not seem appropriate from a financial or court resource prospective. [25]         In my view this is precisely the type of situation which warrants an order allowing the withdrawal of a deemed admission while providing for the other party in costs and other accommodations. [26]         The plaintiff is granted leave to withdraw the… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:37 am
• Re-use of a non-residential structure not requiring a change in zoning or use variance, that does not exceed any of the Type I thresholds, would be a Type II action. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by SHG
Starting Jan. 1, the cost of a listing will be $25 a month plus a $150 initiation fee. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Kan November 25, 2009)("The Court is persuaded by the reasoning of those courts which have found that the presumption does not apply to preliminary injunctions in patent cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:56 am by SHG
  What you won't do it call out the lawyer who does wrong. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm by Anthony Zaller
California’s supplemental paid sick leave that requires employers with more than 25 employees is set to expire on September 30, 2021. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:53 am by James Hamilton
The uptick rule, Rule 10a-1, required all short sale stock transactions to be conducted at a price that was higher than the price of the previous trade. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
Naturally, the attorney does not want to pay the client's medical costs from his own pocket, and litigation ensues. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:53 am
 But once Sky is in that position, how does one weigh up the interest of the trade mark-owning claimant? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:43 am by Travis Crabtree
  In other words, what does the patient get out of the deal from agreeing to those terms? [read post]