Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 9,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
"The 11-1 majority ruled, "In sum, the D.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
Thus, while filing an ANDA is sufficient to trigger an action under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2), this subsection “does not determine the ultimate question whether what will be sold will infringe any relevant patent. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:31 pm
” Mot. at 34-35 (again, the government’s emphasis, not ours). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:35 pm
All it does is turn off the reader, and may even turn the reader against the writer. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP tango) Mexico Starbucks may pay for the use of pre-Columbian royalty images (IP tango) The relevance of the date of first use in Mexican trademark applications (RelatIP.com) Norway Supreme Court majority emphasize experimental exception and right to strive for new knowledge does not mean a research institute may exploit such knowledge commercially without liability for patent infringement: Torbjørn Kvassheim v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:12 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Rev. 1 (2008) (so concluding); Jonathan D. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
John Doe No. 1 which describes additional deaths; and Exhibit C, in which one of Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:Precedential No. 46: TTAB Finds Two "ANTHONY'S" Marks Confusingly Similar for Pizza RestaurantsPrecedential No. 44: TTAB Decides "CAB CALLOWAY" Priority Dispute, Rules that Personal Names Are Inherently DistinctivePrecedential No. 43: TTAB Enters Partial Summary Judgment in 2(d) "VUDU" OppositionPrecedential No. 41: Applicant Loses Third-Party Registration Battle, TTAB Finds Floor… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
§ 154(b)(1)(A). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
., at 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
This change will come into effect July 1, 2011. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:10 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
The plain language of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
Santiago, 582 F.2d 1128, 1130-35 (7th Cir. 1978). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:03 am
The Act, however, does make clear that rules governing the new notices will be similar to the notice rules contained in the ARRA. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:45 am
These injuries were preventable had the Defendant, Healthcare’s and DOES 1-10, provided enough sufficiently trained staff at Doctor’s Medical Center to provide John with the amount of care that state and federal regulations required. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
Pastrana, 09-35. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
McCoy Issue: When a creditor increases the periodic rate on a credit card account in response to a cardholder default, pursuant to a default rate term that was disclosed in the contract governing the account, does Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. [read post]
