Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 9,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
We’re accepting wagers on what the Court will do with these two rehearing petitions at the fast-approaching end of the Term. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
You’re making me tired just thinking about it! [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, and Judge Amit Mehta has scheduled closing arguments for May 2024, so it ain’t over until it’s over. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In that case, In re T.J.S., the court considered whether a married woman could be presumed the legal mother of a child who was conceived with her husband’s sperm and a donor egg, and carried by another woman. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 12:49 am
Nebraska adopted the new protocol after a judge rejected the old one, which involved four jolts of current. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
” Margalit sued McNeil in New York state court for “damages for negligence, failure to warn, defective design, breach of implied and express warranties” and violation of New York consumer laws. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
What we’re seeing in case after case is that there are two separate conceptions of the separation of powers emerging in the Roberts Court. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:43 pm
. ● The Facebook Oversight Board’s recent decision (2021-09), affirming the restoration of a shared Al Jazeera news story about a potential threat of violence from a designated dangerous organization, reflects two recommendations made by U.N. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
Reuters had a piece “Judge presses Giuliani, others on $1.3 billion defamation claims”. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
Clark, “Western NY Judge Resigns Over Administrative, Tech Failures After 28 Years on Bench,” Law.com, Dec 13, 2018. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
” “You’re acting disrespectfully. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
By that we mean that these allegations have induced a federal judge into [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
To this purpose, the author analyses both ancient and modern Jewish and Christian exegesis, as well as relevant examples in contemporary narratives, highlighting the multiple and paradoxical ways in which the untranslatable face of the foe emerges as the necessary counterpart of a religious civilization’s inner topology, designating what must be rejected so that religious meaning can be introjected.Elizabeth Englezos’ essay is titled “Digital-Public Spaces the Spiral… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
Today, the sitting United States attorneys in two of the most important judicial districts in the country—the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York—were appointed by the judges of those districts under Section 546(d). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
This makes ruling in favor of a defendant a dangerous choice for a judge who is required to run for re-election. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
What I saw was alarming.In this column, I will explain the three theocratic battle fronts, because most Americans—including many scholars and judges—are failing to see the forest for the trees.When a government is based on religious belief, it’s called a “theocracy,” which means “government by God. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
But this was a 2-1 decision, penned by Judge Mayer, joined by Lourie, with a scathing dissent by Judge Rader, the next Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Empirical political legitimacy refers to whether citizens in a specific government believe law-making and law-applying processes accord with their fundamental values, including, for example, following democratic procedures and trusting judges to act fairly. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Smith held that KBR’s alleged negligence was not a political question, and that the only potential political question would be if a court had to calculate proportional damages and/or assess contributory negligence—which would only be an issue if the district court found, on remand, that Texas or Tennessee law, rather than Pennsylvania law, governed the dispute. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Against this background, it's not hard to see why judges and scholars have generally taken the position that First Amendment **should not protect** subliminal advertising and other kinds of subliminal communications. [read post]
