Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 8321 - 8340 of 9,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
As I’ve also explained, courts find it easy to parse crimes that fall into the first category, since here we’re talking about someone who has NO right to access the computer or computer system at issue. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:29 am by Veronika Gaertner
The judgment did not give any reasons for the order except for stating that “the defendant had expressed its willingness not to accept the claim and that the judge accepted the claim pursuant to rule 14 par. 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:01 am by Lawrence Taylor
They were good laws, designed to protect citizens. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The regulations alleged to have been violated are designed to provide tenants with information to prevent the risk of exposure to lead hazards. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:35 am by Fernando M. Pinguelo
If you’re looking for scandalous discovery abuses or headline-grabbing fines, you’re not going to find that here. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
But this was a 2-1 decision, penned by Judge Mayer, joined by Lourie, with a scathing dissent by Judge Rader, the next Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2005, a judge of this court rejected a litigant’s contention that the United States was not at war, concluding that “[t]he United States Congress, by its authorization statutes, has initiated war in the same way it has initiated war since World War II.... [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Subway also pointed to the requirements for entries, which demanded a video that “compares Quiznos to Subway and illustrates why Quiznos is better than Subway,” the similar judging criteria, and “Thought Starters” suggesting ideas such as “Double Meat. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:52 pm
You just can't; well maybe not until artificial intelligence has finally gone Singularity, and possibly not even then - human judges find it hard enough a task.The ECD was actively designed to set up that kind of practical responsibility for hosts. [read post]