Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 21,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2015, 7:57 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
., office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, and Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute, where Mr. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:46 am
In the case of Castelluccio v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:35 pm
” Hooper v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
” Bellehumeur v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
Mr. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:41 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
It’s a “myth” that each school “can rely on another college’s research”: “Mr. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:47 am
As for any notice that he would be subject to discipline for not turning over emails and texts, the court pointed to testimony by the lead investigator stating “I want to be clear—I did not tell Mr. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The OLRB stated: “However, Mr. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:00 pm
Mr. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:56 pm
This case (The North Carolina State Bar v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:33 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
On September 2, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in John Haight et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
