Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 70,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Next steps: The team owners may ask for rehearing or may take the case to Federal Court where the Supreme Court may have the final word. [read post]
26 May 2024, 12:44 am
In the recent years the case-law has clarified that emoticons and emojis cannot be registered as trade marks (see The IPKat here and here). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:42 am
Kluwer Trade Mark Blog’s case analysis is available here: Amphorae are not made of glass: really? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:54 am
" when it comes to the massive numbers of trade marks in China. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:26 am
This case may be one of them.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 4:20 am
One of the main functions of a trade mark is to guarantee the origin of goods and services. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:31 pm
See our H1B posting on how to mark a case. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:43 am
Mark examines some of these cases and argues that Yoder‘s dicta was basically correct: although religion cannot be an exclusively collective activity, the existence of a religious community is a crucial factor in the definition of religion for legal purposes. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
Part of the International Conflicts series Mark Drumbl: Bosnia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Losses associated with this case total $7,377,023. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
The Scotch whisky industry has generated a number of interesting case reports lately. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
Case law has long held that "Booking, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:58 am
(‘Hyundai’) considered the sign to resemble its well-known trade name and trade mark in lower case letters, namely ‘hyundai’. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 7:43 am
The Court of Appeal also held that a trade mark consisting of an Italian name, such as the one used in the case under review, was not in itself indicative of any Italian origin of the footwear imported in Italy. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
A couple of initial observations: (1) the mark has allegedly been in use in the US since 2000. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 10:03 am
The complaint appears to address only the word and logo marks. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm
"Appellants have failed to point to any case construing the phrase 'open to the public' to grant the public the right to speak. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Don’t be fooled by the question mark in the title. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
This legal academic notes that, while there are vast complexities interwoven into the practice of fashion borrowing from cultures, trade mark law is pretty straightforward on the matter, and it will be fascinating to see how this, and the Navajo case, progress". [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:42 am
In any case, the Board noted, there is no correct pronunciation of a trademark. [read post]
