Search for: "Matter of Brown" Results 8321 - 8340 of 9,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2009, 3:23 pm
But it`s very interesting that you ask about what exactly they found and where they found it because no matter how many times we asked investigators during their 4:00 PM news conference this evening, they would not tell us, very tight-lipped about what was found, where it was found. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
” This justification for abdicating judicial responsibility is not only legally fallacious, it directly contradicts the clear legal precedent of cases such as Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:36 pm
  Whether it's a weapon or a tool is a matter of perspective. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:49 am
Following Brown’s logic, I think it is unlikely that the feature would actually be an infringement, either direct or secondary, but, as usual, we will have to wait and see what, if any, court action is taken on the matter. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:19 am
Brown in a special  law.com  article, you should sue. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 3:34 am
In both cases, it ultimately didn't matter as the Court ruled on the merits in favor of the employer, still the import of the Ledbetter Act seemed clear to these two judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:29 am
Judge Ivan Fernandez versus Judge Joel Brown. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:21 pm
No matter what your particular persuasion -- prosecutor, defense lawyer, judge, or even criminal -- this is an important decision in white-collar cases. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 10:46 am
As reported by Ron Borges in The Boston Herald, after the issue first was raised, the NFL formed a committee of medical experts in 1994 to study the matter. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 157 (2000) (finding effective ratification from enactment of a specific set of separate regulatory provisions, at a time when the agency's interpretation had historic "consistency"); Brown v. [read post]