Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 9,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks | Actavis v… [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
A great example is Brad Smith, who joined Microsoft as in-house counsel, ran its legal department for many years, and was then promoted to President (beyond still being the company's top lawyer).Possibly the most important breakthrough for Avanci to dateFor Avanci, Daimler's decision to take the pool license is a breakthrough. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This post is from the Reed Smith (and now we should add Cozen) side of the blog only, as Dechert is involved in the litigation to be discussed.You’ll have to forgive us – we’re weird that way – but we found the opinion in Carter v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
These include, inter alia, the tension between the government’s right to speak and the potential First Amendment rights of the government employees who carry the government’s message[1]; the Establishment Clause limitations on the government’s religious speech[2]; the way in which government speech may create the very racial and other inequalities that are the concern of the Equal Protection clause[3]; and the difficult conflict between the government’s right to articulate… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
Contained in the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), section 34 sets its goals: SEC. 34. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
The reality of the most notorious virtual currency is that it is only a matter of time before it comes under the purview of a regulatory body. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Transnational cultural heritage trafficking thrives on an opaque art and antiquities market. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
Smith. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
As usual, I have to skip a lot of interesting presentations and I try to attend things I haven’t seen, no matter how good the ones I have already seen/read drafts of are.Session 1: Trademarks Jason George (and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette), Trademarks as Innovation IncentivesNot saying that the goal is/should be innovation. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
Smith (Debra) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
[because] the specific facts alleged fall beyond the scope of the relevant criminal statute, as a matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:25 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that her employer could be liable under both the law against discrimination act and the Worker's Compensation act. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
We can accommodate five panels - we hope to see you there.Submissions should be made to Susan Smith susan.smith.hls@gmail.com Faculty Assistant and conference coordinator with subject: Money Conference Paper. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
Science may change what we know in the future, but now is what matters. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
Their argument was that it was money they got back from Buma and it doesn’t matter to them where it comes from, as it’s not part of the show’s settlement. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
Moreover—and this point is decisive as a doctrinal matter—the position of the historians' brief about the meaning of equity under Article III is essentially identical to the position of Justice Ginsburg in Grupo Mexicano, a position that a majority of the Court emphatically rejected. 7. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
Here's a guest blogpost, this time from Jaclyn Setili, an associate in Reed Smith's San Francisco office. [read post]