Search for: "Office of Information and Privacy" Results 8321 - 8340 of 16,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by Jim Sedor
.) | Published: 8/26/2015 Presidential candidates can expect very little privacy in their personal life, and with their finances. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:18 pm by Alexander Major
Any other information, marked or otherwise identified in the contract, that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with law, regulations, and Government-wide policies (e.g., privacy, proprietary business information). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 12:31 pm by Maira Sutton
In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by EFF earlier this year, the Office of the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
 The teacher sued for invasion of privacy. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Google’s Chief Privacy Officer, Peter Fleischer, denounced the CNIL decision in a July 30, 2015 blog post, based on three main grounds: It is disproportionate and unnecessary “given that the overwhelming majority of French internet users—currently around 97%—access a European version of Google’s search engine like google.fr, rather than Google.com or any other version of Google. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 11:05 am by Michael Geist
The border measures report has significant privacy implications as the committee recommends a massive expansion in the collection and sharing of biometric information. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am by Michael Geist
The border measures report has significant privacy implications as the committee recommends a massive expansion in the collection and sharing of biometric information. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Eduardo Ustaran
Paul Maynard, Trainee Solicitor in our London office, contributed to this post. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Yet it is the subscriber’s reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her location that concerned the Graham court, not the service provider’s expectation of privacy in its records. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A number of different observers, including this blog, have noted the potential litigation risks that may follow after a data breach, including risk of an action against the directors and officers of the company experiencing the breach. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:24 am by C. Todd Law
The guilty should probably not take comfort in the current resting place of the hijacked information — those who want to find the information will. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:40 am by Steve Lubet
  Goffman herself has noted that checking visitor lists would not violate HIPAA (in this she is correct; although checking patient lists would violate federal privacy law). [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The information was not reasonably current – it related to a conviction almost 10 years old The processing had a disproportionate negative impact on the complainant’s privacy. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 5:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
UK’s Information Commission’s Office– August 20, 2015: “Google Inc has been ordered to remove nine search results after the ICO ruled that they linked to information about a person that was no longer relevant. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As a consequence, such vendors and consultants should use care to advise, and appropriately document their efforts to fully inform their clients and the appropriateness of their actions both to promote and preserve the client relationship and to guard against potential malpractice, deceptive marketing, breach of contract or other claims that unhappy employers or fiduciaries are likely to lodge against advisors or vendors who the employer or fiduciary relied upon to help design or properly… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:34 am by Glyn Moody
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ordered Google to remove links from its search results that point to news stories reporting on earlier removals of links from its search results. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers sponsoring health plans and members of their management named as plan fiduciaries or otherwise having input or oversight over the health plan should verify their company’s group health plan meets the out-of-pocket maximum rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1) as well as a long list of other federal health benefit rules to minimize the risk that violations will compel the sponsoring employer to self-assess, self-report on IRS Form 8928, and… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Garcia also contacted Detective Judson and informed him of the situation. [read post]