Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 14,922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
With this recent BCE/Astral decision, and other recent pro-consumer CRTC initiatives, we may well have a new sheriff in town. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return … [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
Similarly, the Federal Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit[2] has stated that "[t]he owner of land owns as much of the space above him as he uses, but only so long as he uses it. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
Un salario mínimo del DF = 62.33 pesos)Incumplimiento u omisiónMonto de la sanción económicaNo identificar y conocer al clienteDe 200 a 2 mil días de salario mínimoNo guardar o proteger informaciónDe 200 a 2 mil días de salario mínimo de una actividad vulnerableNo respetar los plazos y formasDe 200 a 2 mil días de salario mínimo de presentación de avisosOmisión en la… [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:31 am
Os pesquisadores apontam que a quantidade diária de sódio disponível para consumo é de 4,5 g ou 4. 500mg, por pessoa, sendo que a ingestão máxima recomendada pela OMS é de 2 g ou 2.000 mg. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:52 am
” 2. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:06 pm
Some board have scruples, others don’t. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:32 pm
One of out of 5 consumers receives a different score that the creditor: this meaningful difference means that the consumer would likely qualify for different (worse) credit offers. 2. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
This Court concludes that the FWS’s use of GMUs, and its explanation for their use, pass this test. 2. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
See p. 13. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 4:05 pm
Por otro lado, toda persona que vive de la política y ocupa un cargo público tiene el deber de explicar a la ciudadanía realmente lo que promete, con sus pros y contras. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 4:05 pm
Por otro lado, toda persona que vive de la política y ocupa un cargo público tiene el deber de explicar a la ciudadanía realmente lo que promete, con sus pros y contras. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
The Court reasoned however that “[t]he formation of opinions and entertainment are not opposites” (Von Hannover, p.7), and that “[t]he public has a legitimate interest in being allowed to judge whether the personal behavior of the individual in question, who are often regarded as idols or role models, convincingly tallies with their behavior on their official engagements“ (Von Hannover, p.9). [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
These steps are referred to as (1) Placement, (2) Layering, and (3) Integration. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
("I don't want any Skazka or anything"). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 1:17 am
Los abogados podrían invocar el art.542.2 de la misma LOPJ que establece: “2. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:51 pm
In Lummis II, Judge Hamilton affirmed: "[T]he court concluded that different standards of proof applied to whether an insurer acted in bad faith (a preponderance of the evidence is sufficient), and whether an insured can win punitive damages for bad faith (clear and convincing evidence is required). [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 9:37 am
This post is Chapter 2, part 2 of the book. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
But, in this pattern, the case doesn’t go anywhere. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:21 am
Nunn, Charles P. [read post]
