Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 8321 - 8340 of 30,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm by Marty Lederman
As I'm sure you've all heard by now, the President of the United States issued a series of grotesque, race-baiting, xenophobic (not to mention factually inaccurate) tweets this morning.Of course he did. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:03 pm by Larry
United States is such a painful example of customs litigation, that I have started and deleted draft posts a number of time. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 10:49 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The opinions of the United States Supreme Court are the law of the land and generally must be followed by all states. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:23 am by Michael DelSignore
Continue reading The post United States Supreme Court to decide what nexus must be established for a search of a house for drug activity under the Fourth Amendment appeared first on Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court released an important decision in the case Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
This is also consistent with Recital 21 of the 2017 Regulation, which reads that ‘this Regulation should be applied in a way that ensures full respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the freedom of expression. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm by Brian Murphy and Myles Moran*
As we mentioned in our blog upon this law’s enactment, the United States Supreme Court has routinely held that state laws expressly identifying a category of non-arbitrable state law claims are preempted by the FAA. [read post]