Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 8321 - 8340 of 17,258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
After a jury convicted Aliaksandr Zhyltsou of “a single count of the unlawful transfer of a false identification document, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That is a principle the Court appeared to establish in a late October 2006 decision, Purcell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He pleaded guilty to the one criminal count involved herein. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
" However, if the case is dismissed, the time spent in the wrong court consumes valuable time that could count against you in terms of the statute of limitations on your case. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not sure he has new things to say about that general topic.Cathay Smith: In the ideal situation, would Rogers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Constitution, which states that the nation’s “judicial Power” shallextend to all Cases . . . arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, . . . to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between . . . between a State and Citizens of another State; [and] between Citizens of different States. . . . [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the court dismissed both counts, it dismissed the defamation claim without prejudice (Swindol v Aurora Flight Sciences Corp, September 30, 2014, Aycock, S). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:07 am by Scott Michelman
Ferguson or Japanese internment camps in Korematsu v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:01 am by Minken Employment Lawyers
This question was answered in the recent British Columbia Supreme Court decision of Dodge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
:  implied preemption of state-claims by the federal food and drug law Aetna Life Insurance Company v. [read post]