Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS" Results 8321 - 8340 of 8,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:43 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
When states ban gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, for instance, they cite Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by admin
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:42 am by Victoria Pynchon
Today's New York Times reports on the sorry state of a country so used to defending itself against enemies that their absence has made it turn on itself. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm by Mary Anne Franks
As Justice Raymond Peters of the California Supreme Court wrote in Briscoe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
First, a reasonable juror could infer pretext by disbelieving the college’s stated budgetary rationale. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm by Justin W. Anisman
An exploited employment sector Unpaid internships are coming under fire by the media as seen as a means of exploiting young people for free labour and depressing the job market. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by SHG
And if there was any more irony to be found in Greenhouse’s double secret polemic, it’s in her use of the mean ol’ Fifth Circuit’s Buck v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:13 pm by Tracy Coenen
My article carefully stated that the information was unverified and from an anonymous source. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court found that the board made its determination to terminate the employee without relying on any of the fire chief’s statements or actions (Woods v. [read post]