Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 8,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
Mayer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Indiana v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
Special requirements for employees engaged on Federal or State contracts and grants The Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D) and the State Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 require that University employees directly engaged in the performance of work on a Federal or State contract or grant shall abide by this Policy as a condition of employment. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Tolliver v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Tolliver v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” Judge Young pointed out that to assist the judges in interpreting the expert’s response to that question, the state and federal Supreme Courts have provided broad starting points, founded in evidence Rule 702. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:05 pm
In McCarthy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
In two orders entered on June 30, 2004, see Ernst & Young v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 7:11 pm
Young America's Foundation v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
Then, Kozinski's son stated that he maintained the website with sexually explicit pictures that was shared by his father. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
State and Federal agencies are cracking down on child pornography in an effort to protect the nation's young from repeated online victimization. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
*A State law statute requiring an automatic defibrillator in health clubs wasn’t in effect at the time of this young man’s death. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:03 am
Bush (2004) and Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:51 pm
While public safety certainly calls for the incapacitation of some, there is another side to the equation, which, after United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
The “hygiene hypothesis” is an accepted phenomenon that states children without (or with reduced) exposure to infectious agents (especially parasites) and other microorganisms are more susceptible to developing allergic disease.2. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
