Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8321 - 8340
of 15,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
The judge reviewed the grounds for establishing local connection: (a) normally resident in the local area through choice; (b) local employment; (c) family associations; or (d) special circumstances (s.199(1) 1996 Act). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
One important aspect to be seen, which was elaborated in the case of Major’s Furniture Mart v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
Doe” or United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
The clause states: C. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:35 am
At the arraignment or as soon afterward as practicable, the state may notify the defendant of its intent to use specified evidence at trial in order to afford the defendant an opportunity to object before trial under Rule 12(b)(2)(C). (2) At the Defendant’s Request. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
” The Court held this failed to comply with Government Code § 65080(b)(2)(B)(v)’s statutory requirement to “gather and consider the best practically available scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in the region” as well as CEQA’s information disclosure requirements. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
La. 2010); Gelber v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
The ruling is in Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Supreme Court in The Netherlands).The ruling deals with the exhaustion of the distribution right in copyright protected works under InfoSoc Directive 2001/29, Article 4 of which reads like this:Distribution right1. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:46 am
The USPTO has announced new procedures patent holders can follow to obtain additional Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under the Federal Circuit’s January 2019 decision in Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
Comment: Education Law Article 8-c, Special Annuity, addresses tax deferred annuity programs available to certain employees of the State and political subdivisions of the State. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:00 pm
From Patrick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:59 am
DeAngelo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
(hereinafter Applicant) v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:03 am
In Tubre v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:47 am
Mims v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Those criteria are as follows: a. that there is a serious issue to be tried; b. that the moving party will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; and c. that the balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Michael McKinley, as well as Americas Program Director Ryan C. [read post]
