Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 8321 - 8340 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
If it’s a drug or device mass tort, that means the every plaintiff has different treating doctors, different medical histories, different timing (often years apart), different degrees of damage, different applicable state laws, etc.That’s what happened in PPLL. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While a tie goes to runner in baseball, close calls go to the individual defendants in Section 1983 cases.The case is Cornejo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by Moseley Collins
These injuries were preventable had the Defendant, Healthcare’s and DOES 1-10, provided enough sufficiently trained staff at Doctor’s Medical Center to provide John with the amount of care that state and federal regulations required. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm by James F. Aspell
The Connecticut Appellate Court released it's decison on December 1, 2009 in the case of MARJORIE VORONUK v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 8:06 pm by John Culhane
As one judge stated in a concurring opinion, the logic of the court's opinion isn't limited to doctors. [read post]