Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 8321 - 8340 of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Steven Blumenthal
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Steven Blumenthal
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Steven Blumenthal
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Steven Blumenthal
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:58 pm
But that ruling did not answer the question posed by this case, Danforth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by William A. Ruskin
The Texas Supreme Court rendered judgment in favor of Centocor, Inc., the pharmaceutical manufacturer subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, in a landmark decision involving the learned intermediary doctrine, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:45 pm by Steve Vladeck
My very first Lawfare post, back in December 2011, focused on the messy constitutional question raised by United States v. [read post]