Search for: "State v. Loss"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2023, 4:59 am
In Volokh v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Heller affirmed the individual right to keep and bear arms, and McDonald v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:03 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:18 am
The exchanges believe that the losses to investors from this pilot will be 10 times as great. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
My statements regarding the state of current privacy laws reflect the holding in Pisciotta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am
Across the state, nearly all of Mariner's thirty nursing homes were cited with serious deficiencies. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
Malcolm in Lewisham v Malcolm). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm
As part of our annual review of defamation law in the jurisdiction, we examine two notable reported judgments from 2021 and, as the Northern Ireland Assembly’s legislative programme reaches the final stages, the nature of the reforms proposed by the Defamation Bill. 2021 Cases: MacAirt and Others v JPI Media NI and Foster v Jessen Two reported judgments stood out in 2021. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am
‘Special damages’ may also be awarded for actual monetary loss suffered by the claimant as a result of the publication. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:48 am
Or the upcoming Superman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
The case is Tiemessen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:37 am
See Roby v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
To succeed on her legal malpractice claim, plaintiff would be required to prove that defendants were negligent in their legal representation, that their negligence was a proximate cause of her loss and that she sustained actual and ascertainable damages (see Ehlinger v Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, 304 AD2d 925, 926 [2003]). [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
At the pleading stage, a legal malpractice plaintiff does not need to show “likelihood of success” but “is required only to plead facts from which it could reasonably be inferred that the defendant’s negligence caused” his loss (Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:07 pm
Power Auth. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Cort v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Ct. 2206, 2213–14 (2018) (cell tower records), United States v. [read post]
