Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 8341 - 8360 of 13,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 9:17 am by Greg Daugherty
  That is evident when reading how the IRS distinguished the 2013 Memo from Revenue Ruling 2011-29 (the “2011 Ruling“). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
 It is addressed to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and has a date of December 1, 2010. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:45 am
” Recital 24 and, along the same lines, Article 1(5) states that the Directive does not interfere with any provisions concerning the management of rights at the national level, such as extended collective licensing, legal presumptions of representation or transfer, collective management or similar arrangements or a combination of them, including for mass digitisation. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
Id. at *28-29 (text added).Holdings[1: Irreparable Harm] [W]e reject Apple’s arguments and confirm that the district court was correct to require a showing of some causal nexus between Samsung’s infringing conduct and Apple’s alleged harm [because causal nexus is an necessary part of the irreparable harm inquiry that must be satisfied, irrespective of the type of product encompassed by the patent]. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:19 am by Amy J. Traub
Last month, the New York State Department of Labor (DOL) rather quietly effected legislation that had previously been signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo on March 29, 2013, reforming New York unemployment insurance law effective October 1, 2013. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:44 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Here’s what’s been declassified in this round: Reports to Congress The Attorney General’s Annual Reports on Requests for Access to Business Records under FISA for Years 2006-2012 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 April 10, 2009 NSA notification memorandum to SSCI on the status of the on-going NSA-initiated end-to-end review of its bulk telephony metadata programs conducted pursuant to Section 501 of FISA, and bulk electronic communications metadata program conducted pursuant… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
But it takes two to sue, and on October 29, Gayes’ heirs responded with a hearty “let’s get it on. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
While cohabitation without marriage does not give rise to the property and financial rights which normally attend the marital relation, neither does cohabitation disable the parties from making an agreement within the normal rules of contract law. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Bill Marler
Converted several Tables, charts, and images throughout the Code to meet web accessibility requirements under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
  It wasn’t the right time to "cut plaintiffs off at the knees":[T]his order does not settle any law that will be applied at trial. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:59 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 "shall not make any voluntary or assessed contribution: (1) to any affiliated organization of the United Nations which grants full membership as a state to any organization or group that does not have the internationally recognized attributes of statehood, or (2) to the United Nations, if the United Nations grants full membership as a state in the United Nations to any organization or group that does not have the internationally recognized attributes of statehood,… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
A religious exemption does not violate the Establishment Clause simply by exempting religious institutions but not secular institutions “A law is not unconstitutional simply because it allows churches to advance religion. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
 But `[m]ere presence during the commission of a crime . . . does not constitute aiding and abetting. [read post]