Search for: "High v State"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 35,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Delker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
See Reed v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:25 am
No. 18-1165), the High Court took on the task of deciding whether the “more harm than good” pleading standard it established in the 2014 Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
” 1Fox News Network, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The Court of Appeal (Arden LJ dissenting on the procedural issue only) reversed the High Court’s decision and held that the Special Commissioners had jurisdiction to hear any legal argument relevant to the subject matter of the conclusions stated in a closure notice. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:21 pm
This occurred mere weeks after the highest court in the United States struck down the Federal Government’s mandatory vaccination requirement for large companies. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 11:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
Bush v. Lone Oak Club – Texas Supreme Court Once Again Dives Into the Arcane Law of Water Boundaries
25 May 2020, 11:20 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:22 am
Levine as follows:In Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
Wrote Stephanie Menciner:In both the DC Circuit and the 6th Circuit, the two appellate courts that have upheld the health care law, judges relied heavily on a 2005 Supreme Court ruling in Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:28 am
That’s why the Florida Supreme Court sent a case back for a new sentence in Dunbar v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
(In another post today, Lyle also discusses the order list, including some of the high-profile cases in which the Court either denied certiorari or declined to act.) [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Oregon, holding that non-unanimous jury verdicts in state courts do not violate the Constitution. [read post]
